Earlier this month at the first New York Finance Python User’s Group (NY FPUG) meetup, Kelsey Jordahl talked about how PyQL streamlines the development of Python-based finance applications using QuantLib. There were about 30 people attending the talk at the Cornell Club in New York City. We have a recording of the presentation below.
QuantLib is a free, open-source (BSD-licensed) quantitative finance package. It provides tools for financial instruments, yield curves, pricing engines, creating simulations, and date / time management. There is a lot more detail on the QuantLib website along with the latest downloads. Kelsey refers to a really useful blog / open-source book by one of the core QuantLib developers on implementing QuantLib. Quantlib also comes with different language bindings, including Python.
So why use PyQL if there are already Python bindings in QuantLib? Well, PyQL provides a much more Pythonic set of APIs, in short. Kelsey discusses some of the differences between the original QuantLib Python API and the PyQL API and how PyQL streamlines the resulting Python code. You get better integration with other packages like NumPy, better namespace usage and better documentation. PyQL is available up on GitHub in the PyQL repo. Kelsey uses the IPython Notebooks in the examples directory to explore PyQL and QuantLib and compares the use of PyQL versus the standard (SWIG) QuantLib Python APIs.
PyQL remains a work in progress, with goals to make its QuantLib coverage more complete, the API even more Pythonic, and getting a successful build on Windows (works on Mac OS and Linux now). It’s open source, so feel free to step up and contribute!
For the details, check out the video of Kelsey’s presentation (44 minutes).
And here are the slides online if you want to check the links in the presentation.
If you are interested in working on either QuantLib or PyQL, let the maintainers know!
Related Content
Revolutionizing Materials R&D with “AI Supermodels”
Learn how AI Supermodels are allowing for faster, more accurate predictions with far fewer data points.
Digital Transformation vs. Digital Enhancement: A Starting Decision Framework for Technology Initiatives in R&D
Leveraging advanced technology like generative AI through digital transformation (not digital enhancement) is how to get the biggest returns in scientific R&D.
Digital Transformation in Practice
There is much more to digital transformation than technology, and a holistic strategy is crucial for the journey.
Leveraging AI for More Efficient Research in BioPharma
In the rapidly-evolving landscape of drug discovery and development, traditional approaches to R&D in biopharma are no longer sufficient. Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to be a...
Utilizing LLMs Today in Industrial Materials and Chemical R&D
Leveraging large language models (LLMs) in materials science and chemical R&D isn't just a speculative venture for some AI future. There are two primary use...
Top 10 AI Concepts Every Scientific R&D Leader Should Know
R&D leaders and scientists need a working understanding of key AI concepts so they can more effectively develop future-forward data strategies and lead the charge...
Why A Data Fabric is Essential for Modern R&D
Scattered and siloed data is one of the top challenges slowing down scientific discovery and innovation today. What every R&D organization needs is a data...
Jupyter AI Magics Are Not ✨Magic✨
It doesn’t take ✨magic✨ to integrate ChatGPT into your Jupyter workflow. Integrating ChatGPT into your Jupyter workflow doesn’t have to be magic. New tools are…
Top 5 Takeaways from the American Chemical Society (ACS) 2023 Fall Meeting: R&D Data, Generative AI and More
By Mike Heiber, Ph.D., Materials Informatics Manager Enthought, Materials Science Solutions The American Chemical Society (ACS) is a premier scientific organization with members all over…
Real Scientists Make Their Own Tools
There’s a long history of scientists who built new tools to enable their discoveries. Tycho Brahe built a quadrant that allowed him to observe the…